|
Phenotyping
Aerobic Capacity
|
|
Phenotyping
Aerobic Capacity |
|
|
|
|
The protocol for estimation of aerobic running
capacity requires 2 weeks, starting when the rats
are 11 weeks old. The first week consists of introducing
each rat to the treadmill (Model Exer-4, Columbus
Instruments, Columbus, Ohio (Columbus
Instruments) for a gradually increasing duration
each day. The goal of the first week is to expose
the rats to enough treadmill education so that
they can run for 5 min at a speed of 10 m/min
on a 15° slope. This amount of exposure to
treadmill running is below that required to produce
a significant change in aerobic capacity (Baldwin
et al., 1977; Dudley
et al., 1982).
The first two days of introduction to treadmill
running consists of simply placing the rat on
the belt that is moving at a velocity of 10 m/min
(15° slope) and picking the rat up and moving
it forward if it starts to slide off the back
of the belt. During introduction days 3-5, the
belt speed is gradually increased up to 15 m/min
and failure to run will cause the rats to slide
off of the moving belt and onto a 15 x 15 cm electric
shock grid that delivers 1.2 mA of current at
3 Hz. The rats are left on the grid for about
1.5 sec and then moved forward onto the moving
belt. This process is repeated until the rats
learn to run in order to avoid the mild shock.
The ability to achieve this minimal level of running
at least once constitutes the threshold performance
necessary for inclusion in evaluation for maximal
capacity the following week. Rats not achieving
this minimal running capacity are dropped from
further testing; i.e., the low line is selected
for low running capacity, not zero running capacity.
We lose about 6% of the rats at each generation
because they do not complete the threshold test.
During the second week, each rat is evaluated
for maximal endurance running capacity on five
consecutive days. Each daily endurance trial is
performed at a constant slope of 15° with
the starting velocity at 10 m/min. Treadmill velocity
is increased by 1 m/min every 2 min and each rat
is run until exhausted. Exhaustion is operationally
defined as the third time a rat can no longer
keep pace with the speed of the treadmill and
remains on the shock grid for two seconds rather
than run. At the moment of exhaustion, the current
to the grid is stopped and the rat removed from
the treadmill and weighed.
For each of the five trials, the total distance
run (m) is used as the estimate of aerobic endurance
capacity. The single best daily run of five trials
for each rat is considered the trial most closely
associated with the genetic component of endurance
running capacity. This idea of estimating the
genetic component from the best performance, rather
than (for example) the average of all trials,
has two origins:
- The environment can have an infinite negative
influence upon performance (i.e., a detrimental
environment can take the performance to zero).
Factors such as subtle differences in housing
or daily handling could cause a genetically
superior rat to perform below its maximal ability
on a given day.
- However, the environment can have only a finite
positive influence upon endurance running performance.
That is, environmental influences cannot cause
a rat to perform above the genetically determined
upper limit of its ability. Thus, the rat’s
best performance comes closest to the genetically
determined upper limit of its ability. Because
our goal was to select for genetically determined
differences in phenotype, we used the best performance
rather than the average.
The estimate of capacity is thus based upon the
single best day of running for each rat.
The nomogram below shows the relationship between
distance run, time, and speed for the ramped running
protocol. Given the need to test large numbers
of rats, the running protocol was designed to
provide a test of primarily aerobic endurance
capacity that could be completed in a reasonable
time. That this goal was achieved is evidenced
by the values of average capacity for rats in
the founder population and after six generations
of high line selection. The maximal running capacity
of the founder population was 355 meters, accomplished
in about 22 min at a maximal speed of 20 m/min.
The sixth generation of selection in the high
line produced a population that ran to exhaustion
in 839 m (time = 42 min and maximum speed = 30
m/min). These running distances and times far
exceed the expected capacity of rats for anaerobic
exercise.
Nomogram relating speed and time to distance run
to exhaustion for the speed-ramped protocol. The
starting speed was 10 m/min and was increased
1 m/min every 2 minutes. Average distance run
by the founder population and by the high-line
rats at generation six are indicated by the vertical
arrows.
 | |
|